Having the Last Word
Today’s Gospel reports some of the
argumentative ferment surrounding Jesus.
Various people and factions of the crowd make speculations about His
identity (prophet? Messiah?) and
question His origins (Galilee?
Bethlehem?). Apparently there are
“guards” in the crowds colluding with some Jewish authorities (themselves in
collusion with the Roman occupation?).
The summary verdict of these particular chief priests and Pharisees is
that Jesus is “accursed.” By contrast,
Nicodemus pleads---as a voice of both faith and reason---that it is not just to
condemn someone without first hearing him and finding out “what he is doing.” This whole narrative of confusion and
speculative confrontation (here there is no mention of directly and impartially
questioning Jesus) ends strangely and abruptly:
“Then each went to his own house.”
When I first went to the Piper
Clinic in St. Petersburg, Florida last September for the initial evaluation of
my TMJ problem, my heart was filled with conflicted feelings about my medical
care up to that point, as well as substantial worries about the future of my
jaw’s health for my Priestly ministry (how could I continue to preach or teach
or administer the Sacraments in such pain?).
My temporary home for these troubled thoughts was the Ponce de Leon
Historic Hotel, the cheapest place I could find within walking distance of the
Clinic. As the name would imply, it had
a certain Latin American accent in its décor, which I would describe as heavily
trafficked contemporary---renovated to be slick minimalist, yet
frayed-around-the edges. The rooms were
small, simple, and clean. And the cast
of characters that checked in and out were worthy of a novel (my favorite was the
bridal party standing at the front desk with bags full of vodka and high expectations
for the pre-nuptial evening, if not for the following wedding day).
In any case, the hotel was quirky
and satisfactory, so---creature of habit that I am---I also returned to stay
there in January of this year in the days before my surgery. As reading I brought along an eclectic
assortment of books, including John Zmirak’s The Bad Catholic’s Guide to the Catechism: A Faithful, Fun-Loving Look at Catholic
Dogmas, Doctrines, and Schmoctrines; Jon Meacham’s Thomas Jefferson: The Art of
Power; and two books by Charles C. Mann---1491: New Revelations of the
Americas Before Columbus, and 1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created. Zmirak’s book was a hilarious and profound---post-modern
yet utterly traditional---presentation of the Faith which seemed somehow tailored
to fit my surreal medical situation. The
Jefferson book was the literary equivalent of comfort food, because our third
President was the intellectual obsession of my adolescence. But it was Mann’s two histories of the
Americas that were a perfect fit for my place and time in Florida.
Without doing book reviews, the
genius of Mann’s historical/archeological/sociological/(even biological) reporting
of the “Columbian Exchange”---the infinitely variegated interactions between,
and changes resulting from, the encounter between the “Old World” of Europe and
the “New World” of the Americas---opened my mind further to the endless
complexities of human interaction and the constantly revised historical
narratives which must be the fruit of deeper, more comprehensive research and honest
debate. In terms of the Catholic
Church’s 15-16th century missionary efforts, I detected in Charles
Mann’s secular account no particular love for---or special interest in---the
Catholic Church; nor did I detect overt animus; he was overall rather
indifferent to it. But I was continually
impressed at Mann’s human sympathy for trying to understand what the different
protagonists of a given place and time were trying to accomplish, and the
intended and unintended results of their actions or inactions.
When on March 3, 1513---almost
exactly half a millennium ago---Ponce de Leon set forth by ship from Puerto
Rico, he discovered without knowing it at the time a new way to a new place. In secular terms, his mission was both
extractive and contributive; but the Spanish explorer was part of a spiritual movement
much larger than his mixed motives---to fulfill Christ’s mandate to share the
Catholic faith with all people of all nations.
Seeing the extraordinary beauty of its fauna and flora---and knowing
that this moment of arrival was enfolded in the celebrations of the Easter
season (which the Spaniards called “Pascua
Florida,” the “Festival of Flowers”)---Ponce de Leon called the place La Florida. To this place I came, not exactly to find the
fountain of youth, but to receive healing of my jaw and restoration of my
normal life.
I have been thinking about all of
this in the past few days as I read the media caricatures of Pope Francis and
his involvement as a Jesuit superior in the complexities of the Argentinean
military upheavals of the 1970’s and 1980’s.
Apparently he is blamed for ordering two Jesuit Priests under his care not
to engage in political action in a dangerously volatile area. The Priests were disobedient, subsequently
kidnapped and tortured by governmental authorities (for which, utterly
incomprehensibly, Francis is also held up by some for indirect blame). And when this Jesuit superior risks his life
by secretly and successfully pleading for safe release of these Priests, he is
finally accused of “not speaking out” with sufficient vigor to provoke (convert?)
governmental authorities. [For further commentary on these points, see Edward
Peters’ essay at the end of this blog post.]
When Pope Francis visited the
Basilica of St. Mary Major this past week at the very outset of his Papacy to
pray, he entered a church whose ceiling is literally covered in the first gold
brought over by the conquistadors from the New World. Pope Francis---like every single one of us---walks
under the heavy weight of a very complex history in which weeds and wheat, sin
and sanctity are often inextricably mixed, this side of Judgment Day. The Basilica of St. Mary Major is also the
place where St. Ignatius Loyola celebrated his first Mass, on Christmas Day in
1538. As Pope Francis well knows from
his Jesuit religious life, St. Ignatius wanted to begin his Priestly ministry
by offering the Holy Eucharist at the chapel containing the relics
traditionally associated with the manger of Bethlehem.
Like St. Francis of Assisi before
him, St. Ignatius staked his life on the belief that the humble earthly origins
of our Divine Savior can in every age create a “new beginning.” As we walk with the saints---and now Pope
Francis---through the vicissitudes and ambiguities of history scarred by sin,
we can do so with serenity and joy: We
know that Jesus Christ has gone before us---through every misunderstanding and
beyond every argument---to explore every way forward to our true home, and in
so doing to lay rightful claim by His grace to the realm of Easter (where the
fruit trees always yield and their medicinal leaves never fade [cf. Rev. 22]). The Lord has bigger plans for us than arguing
and going back to fume in the private houses of our own imaginings; we are meant
for the many mansions of Our Father’s House.
Even though life can seem---as St. Teresa of Άvila famously put
it---like “a bad night in a bad inn,” we know in Faith that the Redeemer of
history has the last word because He is
the last Word: “Behold, I make all
things new!” (cf. Rev. 21:5).
+++++++
Bonus Reflection on Today’s Topic
When
Nothing Else Will Work, Accuse a Catholic Prelate of NSO
Edward Peters, JD, JCD, Ref. Sig. Ap.---March 15, 2013
The mainstream media is in panic over Pope Francis.
The new pope is solidly opposed to everything big media
wants (contraception, abortion, ‘same-sex marriage’, etc.), but it can’t simply
write him off as an out-of-touch academic (Benedict) or as a provincial Slav
suffering Nazi and Communist induced post-traumatic stress disorder (John Paul
II). Worse, the first prelate of the Catholic world is a man of proven
commitment to the poor (far more demonstrably than are his limousine liberal
critics), and has lived his whole life in a simplicity that is utterly beyond
the ken of Manhattan or the Beltway sophisticates.
So, confronted by a major Catholic prelate of such
palpable integrity, what’s the media to do? Only one thing: Look up what
country the prelate calls home, find out what trauma that country suffered
(that’s not hard to do, all modern countries suffer from traumas, generally
those organized by their governments), and accuse the prelate of—wait for it—Not
Speaking Out.
NSO is the perfect accusation: first, it can only be
levied by history, that is, by folks with access to much more information than
was possessed by those against whom an NSO is aimed; indeed, as NSO is almost
always raised well after the trauma and its agents have passed from the scene,
retaliation by such agents for reminding folks of their travesties is unlikely
or impossible; very importantly, NSO allows the media to claim the moral high
ground by implying that, had it been on scene during the trauma, it
would surely have “spoken out”. That last claim is, of course, the most
laughable (as—to take just one example of ignored victims of modernity—hundreds
of millions of baby souls will attest on Judgment Day). Best of all, even if
evidence of “speaking out” can be found, it can always be dismissed as “not
enough”.
Totalitarian regimes (whether left or right) act like
rabid dogs in that their behavior, while irrational, is often predictable. Now,
if one can, according to the information available to one at the time, predict
that “speaking out” will provoke an act of irrational savagery, pray, where
exactly is the obligation to speak out such that one’s “failure” (a judgmental
word, notice) to speak out is later sanctionable by those not remotely
confronted with the crisis? What if, moreover, one directly confronted by a
crisis, on the basis of the information available at the time, makes the choice
to oppose the savagery in other, even hidden, ways, though not in a way that
big media pundits, separated from the crisis by decades and oceans, are so sure
was the “correct” way to act?
I figured that an NSO would, sooner or later, be visited
upon Francis, but that it comes so quickly underscores, I think, how really, really
worried big media is about the influence that Francis will wield against their
vision of the world.